Since Apple’s announcement of iBooks Author the internet has been up in arms over the terms of the EULA. Put simply, the output generated by the iBooks Author application must be sold through the iTunes store or given away for free.
I think there is a bit of a misconception, in general, to those who are opposed to these terms. Essentially, what Apple has provided is a tool for authors to take their works and make them available to iBooks. The tool is free and easy to use. Apple isn’t claiming exclusive rights to anything except the actual iBook formatted ‘book’ that gets generated with their free tool.
Here’s some various takes on the fallout.
Daniel Steinberg at Dim Sum Thinking:
The folks complaining are looking at Author as standalone software. It’s not.
John Gruber On the Proprietary Nature of the iBooks Author File Format:
Apple’s concern is not what’s best for the publishing industry, and it certainly isn’t about what’s best for the makers of (and users of) rival e-book reading devices.
David Smith – Truly Unprecedented in iBooks 2:
The real story here today shouldn’t be that Apple has ‘audaciously’ claimed ownership of the books make with iBooks Author but that they have created an avenue for non-commercial distribution that would exclude them entirely. That is actually unprecedented.
Ed Bott at ZDNet:
Over the years, I have read hundreds of license agreements, looking for little gotchas and clear descriptions of rights. But I have never, ever seen a legal document like the one Apple has attached to its new iBooks Author program.
Dan Wineman on The Unprecedented Audacity of the iBooks Author EULA:
In other words: Apple is trying to establish a rule that whatever I create with this application, if I sell it, I have to give them a cut. And iBooks Author is free, so this arrangement sounds pretty reasonable.
Here’s the problem: I didn’t agree to it. Apple wants me to believe I did, of course, just by using the software:
Read More